MULICK CONTRACTING, INC. v. Stafford

276 S.W.3d 906, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098, 2009 WL 485993
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 2009·No. ED 91288·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*907 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Bic Stafford appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against her individually and Bic Real Estate, LLC awarding $7,055.51 to Mulick Contracting, Inc. (“Mulick”) on a claim of quantum meruit. Dr. Stafford claims that the trial court erred in holding that she was individually liable to Mulick because it performed work on real property owned by separate defendant Bic Real Estate, LLC. Bic Real Estate, LLC does not appeal the judgment against it. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in finding Dr. Stafford personally liable to Mulick. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MULICK CONTRACTING, INC. v. Stafford, 276 S.W.3d 906, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098, 2009 WL 485993 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

276 S.W.3d 906 (MULICK CONTRACTING, INC. v. Stafford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dependents of Avery v. Botkin Lumber Co.
276 S.W.3d 906 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)