MULICK CONTRACTING, INC. v. Stafford

276 S.W.3d 906, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098, 2009 WL 485993
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 17, 2009
DocketED 91288
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 S.W.3d 906 (MULICK CONTRACTING, INC. v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MULICK CONTRACTING, INC. v. Stafford, 276 S.W.3d 906, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098, 2009 WL 485993 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

*907 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Bic Stafford appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against her individually and Bic Real Estate, LLC awarding $7,055.51 to Mulick Contracting, Inc. (“Mulick”) on a claim of quantum meruit. Dr. Stafford claims that the trial court erred in holding that she was individually liable to Mulick because it performed work on real property owned by separate defendant Bic Real Estate, LLC. Bic Real Estate, LLC does not appeal the judgment against it. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in finding Dr. Stafford personally liable to Mulick. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dependents of Avery v. Botkin Lumber Co.
276 S.W.3d 906 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 S.W.3d 906, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1098, 2009 WL 485993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulick-contracting-inc-v-stafford-moctapp-2009.