Mulholland v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co.

66 Miss. 339
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 66 Miss. 339 (Mulholland v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mulholland v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co., 66 Miss. 339 (Mich. 1889).

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plant furnished by the appellees for the creation and distribution of electric lights, is “ material furnished about the erection and construction, alteration or repairs” of the boat “Lake Washington,” within the meaning of § 1378, of the code.of 1880.

Lights are essential to the business in which the boat engages, and the articles supplied were intended as a permanent part of the boat, and are attached to it and part of it.

The case was fairly submitted to the jury, and the verdict being [345]*345manifestly for the value of the plant and not for the contract price, it should not be disturbed, even if there be errors touching the right of the plaintiff to recover on the contract.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mississippi Butane Gas System Co. v. Glisson
10 So. 2d 358 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1942)
O'Neill v. Lyric Amusement Co.
178 S.W. 406 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1915)
Scannevin v. Consolidated Mineral Water Co.
55 A. 754 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Miss. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulholland-v-thomson-houston-electric-co-miss-1889.