Mulhollan v. M'Crummen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Mulhollan v. M'Crummen

1 Mart. (N.S.) 575

DecidedSeptember 15, 1823

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mart. (N.S.) 575 (Mulhollan v. M'Crummen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulhollan v. M'Crummen, 1 Mart. (N.S.) 575 (La. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff and appellee has brought [576]*576up the record, the defendant and appellant having neglected doing so. It appears there is no statement of facts, &c so that we cannot, inquire into the merits of the case—no error is assigned. We conclude the appellant had nothing in view but delay.

West’n District Sept. 1823. Oakley for the plaintiff, Scott for the defendant.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be affirmed; and that the plaintiff recover 10 per cent. damages, on the judgment, with costs in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff and appellee has brought [576]*576up the record, the defendant and appellant having neglected doing so. It appears there is no statement of facts, &c so that we cannot, inquire into the merits of the case—no error is assigned. We conclude the appellant had nothing in view but delay.

West’n District Sept. 1823. Oakley for the plaintiff, Scott for the defendant.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be affirmed; and that the plaintiff recover 10 per cent. damages, on the judgment, with costs in both courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mart. (N.S.) 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulhollan-v-mcrummen-la-1823.