Mulgado v. Rodriguez
This text of 933 So. 2d 657 (Mulgado v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Angel MULGADO, Appellant,
v.
Deisy RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Angel Mulgado, pro se, Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
Philip C. Claypool, General Counsel, and Julia Cobb Costas, Staff Counsel, for Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee.
PER CURIAM.
The Commission on Ethics' motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed. Appellant as complainant was not a party to the proceeding below before the Commission on Ethics, and, therefore, is not a proper party to proceed in this appeal. See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. Admin. Code Rule 34-5.011 (providing *658 that the respondent is the only party to an action before the Commission on Ethics).
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
933 So. 2d 657, 2006 WL 1835716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulgado-v-rodriguez-fladistctapp-2006.