Mulgado v. Rodriguez

933 So. 2d 657, 2006 WL 1835716
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 2006·No. 1D06-0813·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

933 So.2d 657 (2006)

Angel MULGADO, Appellant,
v.
Deisy RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.

No. 1D06-0813.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 6, 2006.

Angel Mulgado, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

Philip C. Claypool, General Counsel, and Julia Cobb Costas, Staff Counsel, for Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

The Commission on Ethics' motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed. Appellant as complainant was not a party to the proceeding below before the Commission on Ethics, and, therefore, is not a proper party to proceed in this appeal. See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. Admin. Code Rule 34-5.011 (providing *658 that the respondent is the only party to an action before the Commission on Ethics).

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mulgado v. Rodriguez, 933 So. 2d 657, 2006 WL 1835716 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

933 So. 2d 657 (Mulgado v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON ETHICS
79 So. 3d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Adams v. State
933 So. 2d 657 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)