Mulford v. Allen

2 N.J. Eq. 288
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedJanuary 15, 1840
StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J. Eq. 288 (Mulford v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mulford v. Allen, 2 N.J. Eq. 288 (N.J. Ct. App. 1840).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

Mary A. Dare has been made a complainant without her consent. She claims adversely to the prayer of the bill. It is not enough that the court will protect her interests. She has a right to stand in such a position that she may set up her claim as she sees fit. As all the parties are before the court, there can be no difficulty In allowing the motion. She must be made a defendant, and permitted to set up her rights in her own way. The rule requiring the solicitor to pay costs for making use of a party’s name without consent, cannot apply when he has been applied to by one of several executors or administrators, and has acted in the name of all.

Motion allowed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.J. Eq. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulford-v-allen-njch-1840.