Mulet v. Kelly
This text of 49 A.D.3d 336 (Mulet v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Credible evidence rebuts the World Trade Center presumption (Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252.1 [1] [a]), assuming it applies, and supports the Medical Board’s determination that petitioner’s disability is not traumatic in origin (see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760-761 [1996]). We have considered petitioner’s other arguments, including those based on the conflicting opinions of his psychiatrist and social worker, and find them unavailing. Concur&emdash;Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Friedman and Nardelli, JJ. (See 2006 NY Slip Op 30186(U).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A.D.3d 336, 852 N.Y.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulet-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2008.