Muldrow v. Eagleton

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 22, 2003
• Docket: 03-7118
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7118

EDWARD LEON MULDROW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden; MAJOR JOYNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron M. Currie, District Judge. (CA-02-3294-22BC-3)

Submitted: November 14, 2003 Decided: December 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Leon Muldrow, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Edward Leon Muldrow appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated by the district

court. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying the Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. Brown v.

French, 147 F.3d 307, 310 (4th Cir. 1998). See Muldrow v. Eagleton,

No. CA-02-3294-22BC-3 (D.S.C. May 30, 2003; July 7, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED