Muldrow v. City of Florence

Fourth Circuit

Muldrow v. City of Florence

49 F. App'x 475

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2002·No. No. 02-7137·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Angelo Muldrow appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Muldrow v. City of Florence, No. CA-01-3701-0-18-BD (D.S.C. July 15, 2002). Muldrow’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Angelo Muldrow appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Muldrow v. City of Florence, No. CA-01-3701-0-18-BD (D.S.C. July 15, 2002). Muldrow’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Muldrow v. City of Florence, 49 F. App'x 475 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

49 F. App'x 475 (Muldrow v. City of Florence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related