Muldoon v. Klein

246 A.D. 764
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to the commencement of an action at law for money damages. We are of opinion that the allegations of the complaint not only fail to set forth facts showing the existence of a partnership, but that it affirmatively appears therefrom that the plaintiff was nothing more than an employee or agent working on a commission based upon the gross volume of business procured, without any interest in the so-called partnership assets or possible profits. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muldoon v. Klein, 246 A.D. 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 764 (Muldoon v. Klein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Jones
15 Misc. 2d 960 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)