Muldoon v. Blackwell

The Superior Court of New York City

Muldoon v. Blackwell

13 Jones & S. 635

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedDecember 1, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Jones & S. 635 (Muldoon v. Blackwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muldoon v. Blackwell, 13 Jones & S. 635 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Curtis, Ch. J.

The action is for goods sold and work and labor done. The answer sets up failure to perform, and matters by way of recoupment. Upon the close of plaintiffs’ case, it was submitted to the [636]*636referee, who found for the plaintiffs. The evidence appears to sustain the findings of fact presented in the report of the referee. The exceptions of the defendants are not sufficient to call for a new trial.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed with costs.

Freedman, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis, Ch. J.

The action is for goods sold and work and labor done. The answer sets up failure to perform, and matters by way of recoupment. Upon the close of plaintiffs’ case, it was submitted to the [636]*636referee, who found for the plaintiffs. The evidence appears to sustain the findings of fact presented in the report of the referee. The exceptions of the defendants are not sufficient to call for a new trial.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed with costs.

Freedman, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Jones & S. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muldoon-v-blackwell-nysuperctnyc-1879.