Muldoon v. A. F. D., Inc.
This text of 277 A.D.2d 1144 (Muldoon v. A. F. D., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a third-party action to recover indemnity for liability imposed by a judgment in a negligence action, and to recover counsel fees, judgment, entered in favor of the third-party plaintiff, after trial by the court without a jury, reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The judgment in the action of Rose v. Muldoon {post, p. 1147, decided herewith) having been reversed and a new trial granted, there should be a new trial in the third-party action. Appeal from orders dated May 26, 1949, and July 9, 1949, dismissed, without costs. There are no such orders in the record. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muldoon-v-a-f-d-inc-nyappdiv-1950.