Mulcahy v. Town of Tiverton, Nc95-0210 (1996)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Mulcahy v. Town of Tiverton, Nc95-0210 (1996)

DecidedApril 17, 1996

DocketCase Number NC95-0210

StatusPublished

This text of Mulcahy v. Town of Tiverton, Nc95-0210 (1996) (Mulcahy v. Town of Tiverton, Nc95-0210 (1996)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulcahy v. Town of Tiverton, Nc95-0210 (1996), (R.I. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION The matter is before the Court on the appeal of Charles Mulcahy, a police officer in the Town of Tiverton, from the actions of a three member Hearing Committee imposing certain sanctions following the filing of a complaint by Alton H. Conn, Chief of Police of the Tiverton Police Department.

A briefing schedule was established by the Court. The defendant appellee's brief is in the nature of a Motion to Dismiss, alleging that the appellant's appeal was not filed within thirty days of the decision rendered on April 29, 1995 by the Hearing Committee, and thus he has failed to comply with the provisions of R.I.G.L. § 12-35-15 (b).

The file clearly indicates that the appellant's petition was date/filed on May 17, 1995 and thus complies with the statute.

Appellee's Motion to Dismiss is denied, and the appellee has until May 20, 1996 to file his brief on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION The matter is before the Court on the appeal of Charles Mulcahy, a police officer in the Town of Tiverton, from the actions of a three member Hearing Committee imposing certain sanctions following the filing of a complaint by Alton H. Conn, Chief of Police of the Tiverton Police Department.

A briefing schedule was established by the Court. The defendant appellee's brief is in the nature of a Motion to Dismiss, alleging that the appellant's appeal was not filed within thirty days of the decision rendered on April 29, 1995 by the Hearing Committee, and thus he has failed to comply with the provisions of R.I.G.L. § 12-35-15 (b).

The file clearly indicates that the appellant's petition was date/filed on May 17, 1995 and thus complies with the statute.

Appellee's Motion to Dismiss is denied, and the appellee has until May 20, 1996 to file his brief on the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mulcahy v. Town of Tiverton, Nc95-0210 (1996), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulcahy-v-town-of-tiverton-nc95-0210-1996-risuperct-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack