Mulcahy v. Purcell
157 A.D. 939, 142 N.Y.S. 1131
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1913
StatusPublished
This text of 157 A.D. 939 (Mulcahy v. Purcell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mulcahy v. Purcell, 157 A.D. 939, 142 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the communication to the jury of the information that there was an insurance company behind the defendants was improper and prejudicial. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
157 A.D. 939, 142 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulcahy-v-purcell-nyappdiv-1913.