Mulcahey v. . Federal Sugar Refining Company
105 N.E. 1102, 210 N.Y. 637, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1417
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Miller and Cardozo, JJ. . Absent: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mulcahey v. . Federal Sugar Refining Company, 105 N.E. 1102, 210 N.Y. 637, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1417 (N.Y. 1914).
105 N.E. 1102 (Mulcahey v. . Federal Sugar Refining Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.