Mulcahey v. . Federal Sugar Refining Company
105 N.E. 1102, 210 N.Y. 637, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1417
This text of 105 N.E. 1102 (Mulcahey v. . Federal Sugar Refining Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mulcahey v. . Federal Sugar Refining Company, 105 N.E. 1102, 210 N.Y. 637, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1417 (N.Y. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Miller and Cardozo, JJ. . Absent: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
105 N.E. 1102, 210 N.Y. 637, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulcahey-v-federal-sugar-refining-company-ny-1914.