Mukhailova v. Kings Plaza & Vornado Realty Trust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mukhailova v. Kings Plaza & Vornado Realty Trust

26 A.D.3d 420, 808 N.Y.S.2d 910

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.3d 420 (Mukhailova v. Kings Plaza & Vornado Realty Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mukhailova v. Kings Plaza & Vornado Realty Trust, 26 A.D.3d 420, 808 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated June 15, 2005, as granted its motion to sever the third-party action only to the extent that severance was deferred until the time of trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the appellant’s motion to sever the third-party action only to the extent that severance was deferred until the time of trial. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated June 15, 2005, as granted its motion to sever the third-party action only to the extent that severance was deferred until the time of trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the appellant’s motion to sever the third-party action only to the extent that severance was deferred until the time of trial. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.3d 420, 808 N.Y.S.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mukhailova-v-kings-plaza-vornado-realty-trust-nyappdiv-2006.