Muka v. Yesawich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Muka v. Yesawich

53 A.D.2d 1005, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15802

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 30, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 1005 (Muka v. Yesawich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muka v. Yesawich, 53 A.D.2d 1005, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss petition granted, without costs. A proceeding in the nature of mandamus may not be used to challenge a determination which may be reviewed by appeal. [1006]*1006Nor may such proceeding be used to challenge a determination made in a civil action (CPLR 7801; Matter of Jemzura v Lee, 38 AD2d 865). Motion for preliminary injunction denied as academic. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss petition granted, without costs. A proceeding in the nature of mandamus may not be used to challenge a determination which may be reviewed by appeal. [1006]*1006Nor may such proceeding be used to challenge a determination made in a civil action (CPLR 7801; Matter of Jemzura v Lee, 38 AD2d 865). Motion for preliminary injunction denied as academic. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 1005, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muka-v-yesawich-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack