Muka v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Muka v. State

76 N.Y.2d 769

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1990·No. Claims Nos. 78586, 78587, 78588 and 78589·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to dismiss the appeals, insofar as taken from the September 18, 1989 and February 26, 1990 orders of the Court of Claims granted, and the appeals dismissed and, on the court’s own motion, the appeals, insofar as taken from the March 13, 1990 judgments of the Court of Claims, dismissed, each unless within 20 days appellant, if she be so advised, serves upon respondent and files in this court a notice that she has abandoned her appeal to the Appellate Division, and stipulates for the withdrawal of that appeal (Parker v Roger-son, 35 NY2d 751). Cross motion to strike the motion papers and affidavit of service, for the imposition of sanctions and for other items of relief, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss the appeals, insofar as taken from the September 18, 1989 and February 26, 1990 orders of the Court of Claims granted, and the appeals dismissed and, on the court’s own motion, the appeals, insofar as taken from the March 13, 1990 judgments of the Court of Claims, dismissed, each unless within 20 days appellant, if she be so advised, serves upon respondent and files in this court a notice that she has abandoned her appeal to the Appellate Division, and stipulates for the withdrawal of that appeal (Parker v Roger-son, 35 NY2d 751). Cross motion to strike the motion papers and affidavit of service, for the imposition of sanctions and for other items of relief, denied.

Muka v. State, 76 N.Y.2d 769 (N.Y. 1990).

Pincite

76 N.Y.2d 769 (Muka v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related