Muka v. State

496 N.E.2d 236, 68 N.Y.2d 662, 505 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19052
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 10, 1986
DocketClaim No. 70703
StatusPublished

This text of 496 N.E.2d 236 (Muka v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muka v. State, 496 N.E.2d 236, 68 N.Y.2d 662, 505 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19052 (N.Y. 1986).

Opinion

Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department. A direct appeal does not lie because no substantial question is presented as to the constitutional validity of the challenged statute (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5601
New York CVP § 5601

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 N.E.2d 236, 68 N.Y.2d 662, 505 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muka-v-state-ny-1986.