Muka v. Pollock

New York Court of Appeals

Muka v. Pollock

76 N.Y.2d 769

DecidedJune 14, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 76 N.Y.2d 769 (Muka v. Pollock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muka v. Pollock, 76 N.Y.2d 769 (N.Y. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

On the court’s own motion, appeals from the orders of [770]*770Supreme Court, Tompkins County, dated November 3, 1989 and November 24, 1989, and from the orders of Supreme Court, Broome County, dated September 8, 1989 and January 22, 1990, transferred, without costs, to the Appellate Division, Third Department, each upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]). Motion for waiver of strict compliance with this court’s Rule of Practice dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the court’s own motion, appeals from the orders of [770]*770Supreme Court, Tompkins County, dated November 3, 1989 and November 24, 1989, and from the orders of Supreme Court, Broome County, dated September 8, 1989 and January 22, 1990, transferred, without costs, to the Appellate Division, Third Department, each upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]). Motion for waiver of strict compliance with this court’s Rule of Practice dismissed as academic.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 N.Y.2d 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muka-v-pollock-ny-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack