Muka v. Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust
This text of 465 N.E.2d 43 (Muka v. Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the grounds that a direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (CPLR 5601, subd [b], par 2) and where the constitutional questions involved are not substantial, and upon the further ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon appellant’s default (CPLR 5511).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 N.E.2d 43, 62 N.Y.2d 690, 476 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muka-v-hancock-estabrook-ryan-shove-hust-ny-1984.