Muka v. Aloi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Muka v. Aloi

119 A.D.2d 888, 501 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 888 (Muka v. Aloi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muka v. Aloi, 119 A.D.2d 888, 501 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding, pursuant to CPLR article 78, commenced in this court, dismissed, without costs. Petitioner commenced the present proceeding seeking, inter alia, to enjoin all Supreme Court Justices of New York State from entertaining any motion, action or special proceeding, other than a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 78.03, concerning petitioner’s competency to represent herself in the commencement, prosecution or defense of any action or special proceeding in the State of New York. Even if it is assumed that this court has personal jurisdiction of all named respondents, the proceeding must be dismissed as petitioner has failed to establish any present right to the relief requested.

Motions by petitioner to strike respondents’ answer, dismiss [889]*889defenses and for other relief denied, without costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding, pursuant to CPLR article 78, commenced in this court, dismissed, without costs. Petitioner commenced the present proceeding seeking, inter alia, to enjoin all Supreme Court Justices of New York State from entertaining any motion, action or special proceeding, other than a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 78.03, concerning petitioner’s competency to represent herself in the commencement, prosecution or defense of any action or special proceeding in the State of New York. Even if it is assumed that this court has personal jurisdiction of all named respondents, the proceeding must be dismissed as petitioner has failed to establish any present right to the relief requested.

Motions by petitioner to strike respondents’ answer, dismiss [889]*889defenses and for other relief denied, without costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 888, 501 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muka-v-aloi-nyappdiv-1986.