Mujica v. Royce
Opinion
Filed Date: 8/30/21 US. DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YORK ~o----- +--+ +--+ +--+ +--+ +--+ □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ BROOKLYN OFFICE ARTURO MUJICA, : Petitioner, : : ORDER V. : 19-CV-5169 (WFK) JMW) MARK ROYCE, : Respondent. : nee een eee KX WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: On August 11, 2021, the Honorable Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this Court DENY Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus in its entirety. ECF No. 16. Written objections to the R&R were due fourteen days from service of the report, and to date, no objection has been filed. In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).. Where no objections have been filed, the Court reviews a report and recommendation for clear error. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (Garaufis, J.). The Court finds no such error here. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 16.
SO ORDERED. s/ WFK HON. WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 30, 2021 Brooklyn, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mujica v. Royce (Mujica v. Royce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.