Mujahid v. Stouffer
This text of Mujahid v. Stouffer (Mujahid v. Stouffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6692
SHAKKIR TALIB MUJAHID,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01- 2791-MJG)
Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 20, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shakkir Talib Mujahid, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Shakkir Talib Mujahid appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See Mujahid v. Stouffer, No. CA-01-2791-MJG (D.
Md. Apr. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mujahid v. Stouffer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mujahid-v-stouffer-ca4-2002.