Muir v. Preferred Accident Ins.
This text of 122 F. 1022 (Muir v. Preferred Accident Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I have attentively considered the very ingenious argument which has been submitted in support of the defendant’s motion for a new trial, but have not been convinced by it. The construction sought to be put upon several of the clauses of the policy in suit, as applied to the undisputed facts of this ease, is in each instance, I think, too subtle, strained, and unnatural to be adopted at the instance of the company by which that policy was framed and issued. The motion for a new trial is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 F. 1022, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muir-v-preferred-accident-ins-circtedpa-1903.