Muir v. Hodges

116 F. 912, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5052
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont·Decided July 25, 1902·Published

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This is a creditors’ bill, showing a judgment in this court against the defendant Maria for $2,000 damages and $27.03 costs, with a return of no goods to be found on the execution, and the receipt of the use of her dower, and her share in the personal estate of her husband by the defendants E. H. and E. W. Hodges, and has been heard on demurrer; the principal ground of which is the uncertain description of property to be reached. Her share of the rents and profits of the lands in which she has had the right of dower unassigned would be liable for her debts, and reachable in their hands (Holmes v. Bridgman, 37 Vt. 28); and her distributive share of her husband’s estate, alleged to' have gone into and to have remained in their hands, seems to be well enough described to require answer. They will probably understand what is meant.

Demurrer overruled; defendants to answer over by August 19th.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muir v. Hodges, 116 F. 912, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5052 (circtdvt 1902).

116 F. 912 (Muir v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holmes v. Bridgman
37 Vt. 28 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1864)