Muir v. Clark
This text of 7 Blackf. 423 (Muir v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A BILL in chancery for relief against a usurious contract, must show that the principal and lawful interest have been paid or tendered; and in the case of a tender, the money must be brought into Court. Crawford et al. v. Harvey, 1 Blackf. 382.
The 33d section of the R. S. 1843, p. 582, respecting “ the interest of money,” applies only to bills of discovery.
A bill in chancery showing that the complainant has no equity, may be objected to at any stage of the proceedings. Cummins v. White et al. 4 Blackf. 356.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Blackf. 423, 1845 Ind. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muir-v-clark-ind-1845.