Muir v. Clark

7 Blackf. 423, 1845 Ind. LEXIS 59
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 1845·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

A BILL in chancery for relief against a usurious contract, must show that the principal and lawful interest have been paid or tendered; and in the case of a tender, the money must be brought into Court. Crawford et al. v. Harvey, 1 Blackf. 382.

The 33d section of the R. S. 1843, p. 582, respecting “ the interest of money,” applies only to bills of discovery.

A bill in chancery showing that the complainant has no equity, may be objected to at any stage of the proceedings. Cummins v. White et al. 4 Blackf. 356.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muir v. Clark, 7 Blackf. 423, 1845 Ind. LEXIS 59 (Ind. 1845).

7 Blackf. 423 (Muir v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells v. Sprague
10 Ind. 305 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1858)
Burton v. Braden
4 Ind. 539 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1853)