Muina v. Hood

349 So. 2d 745
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 1977·No. No. GG-294·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal presents several points, including the jurisdiction of the trial court which alone is a proper matter for interlocutory appeal. On that point appellant’s argument is without substantial merit. Fla.App. Rule 4.2.c. The interlocutory appeal is

DISMISSED.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muina v. Hood, 349 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

349 So. 2d 745 (Muina v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mulligan v. Wallace
349 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)