Muhammad's Temple of Islam, Inc. v. New York World-Telegram Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Muhammad's Temple of Islam, Inc. v. New York World-Telegram Corp.

15 A.D.2d 896, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10946

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.2d 896 (Muhammad's Temple of Islam, Inc. v. New York World-Telegram Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muhammad's Temple of Islam, Inc. v. New York World-Telegram Corp., 15 A.D.2d 896, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dispense with printing granted to the extent of permitting the appeals in the Hearst actions to be heard in one appeal book, without duplication of printing, and dispensing with the printing in the record on appeal of the original exhibits in the Hearst actions and the original exhibits in the New York World-Telegram, action on condition that the originals thereof are filed with this court on or before the Wednesday preceding the day of the term for which the appeals are noticed for argument. In all other respects the motion is denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dispense with printing granted to the extent of permitting the appeals in the Hearst actions to be heard in one appeal book, without duplication of printing, and dispensing with the printing in the record on appeal of the original exhibits in the Hearst actions and the original exhibits in the New York World-Telegram, action on condition that the originals thereof are filed with this court on or before the Wednesday preceding the day of the term for which the appeals are noticed for argument. In all other respects the motion is denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.2d 896, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muhammads-temple-of-islam-inc-v-new-york-world-telegram-corp-nyappdiv-1962.