Muhammad Waseem Chughtai v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 13, 2016
Docket05-15-01275-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Muhammad Waseem Chughtai v. State (Muhammad Waseem Chughtai v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muhammad Waseem Chughtai v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order entered April 13, 2016

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01275-CR

MUHAMMAD WASEEM CHUGHTAI, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-82673-2014

ORDER The Court DENIES appellant’s third motion to extend time to file his brief.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has

not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Muhammad Waseem Chughtai v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muhammad-waseem-chughtai-v-state-texapp-2016.