Muhammad v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Muhammad v. United States

228 F. App'x 265

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2007·No. No. 06-7718·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Muhammad, No. l:04-cv00252-IMK-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[266]*266fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Muhammad, No. l:04-cv00252-IMK-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[266]*266fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Muhammad v. United States, 228 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

228 F. App'x 265 (Muhammad v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.