Muhammad v. Shearin
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David William Stigger appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act and 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Warden Bobby Shearin, No. 1:13—cv-01072-ELH (D.Md. Oct. 17, 2013 & June 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
586 F. App'x 139 (Muhammad v. Shearin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.