Muhammad v. Muhammad

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Muhammad v. Muhammad

915 So. 2d 238, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18747, 2005 WL 3179598

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2005·No. No. 1D05-4234·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of October 7, 2005, the Court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Specifically, because the appellant’s motion for rehearing of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage was not timely served pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(b), the motion did not delay rendition of the final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.

BENTON, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of October 7, 2005, the Court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Specifically, because the appellant’s motion for rehearing of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage was not timely served pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(b), the motion did not delay rendition of the final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.

BENTON, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Muhammad v. Muhammad, 915 So. 2d 238, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18747, 2005 WL 3179598 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

915 So. 2d 238 (Muhammad v. Muhammad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.