Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Muhammad v. Decker

Muhammad v. Decker

929 So. 2d 575, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399, 2006 WL 941986
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-1208
StatusPublished

This text of 929 So. 2d 575 (Muhammad v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muhammad v. Decker, 929 So. 2d 575, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399, 2006 WL 941986 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Muhammad v. Crosby, 922 So.2d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (on motions for rehearing, rehearing en banc, certification, and consolidation).

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muhammad v. Crosby
922 So. 2d 236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 575, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5399, 2006 WL 941986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muhammad-v-decker-fladistctapp-2006.