Muhammad v. Cochrane
This text of 479 F. App'x 537 (Muhammad v. Cochrane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders: accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment; and entering judgment of $2000 for Muhammad in accordance with a jury verdict in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny the motions for transfer and for a transcript and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 F. App'x 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muhammad-v-cochrane-ca4-2012.