Muhammad v. Cochrane

479 F. App'x 537
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2012·No. No. 12-6793·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders: accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment; and entering judgment of $2000 for Muhammad in accordance with a jury verdict in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny the motions for transfer and for a transcript and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muhammad v. Cochrane, 479 F. App'x 537 (4th Cir. 2012).

479 F. App'x 537 (Muhammad v. Cochrane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related