Muhammad Temple of Islam of Shreveport v. City of Shreveport

517 F.2d 922
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 13, 1975
Docket75-1190
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 517 F.2d 922 (Muhammad Temple of Islam of Shreveport v. City of Shreveport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muhammad Temple of Islam of Shreveport v. City of Shreveport, 517 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have reviewed the record in the instant case and agree with the opinion of the district court, Muhammad Temple of Islam of Shreveport v. City of Shreveport, 387 F.Supp. 1129 (W.D.La.1974). Additionally we note that the Supreme Court decision in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. The Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240, 95 S.Ct. 1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975) forecloses appellants claim for attorney’s fees on the private attorneys general theory. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bickford v. John E. Mitchell Co.
595 F.2d 540 (Tenth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Silberman
464 F. Supp. 866 (M.D. Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 F.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muhammad-temple-of-islam-of-shreveport-v-city-of-shreveport-ca5-1975.