Muhammad (Rahim) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAHIM MUHAMMAD, No. 79223 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent.
SPP 0 4 2019
A_ BROWN
CLE PREME COURT BY
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUrt CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Scott N. Freeman, Judge.
Appellant has filed a notice to voluntarily dismiss this appeal.
This court elects to treat this notice as a motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, the motion is granted. NRAP 42(b). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'
/.1,4.4; , J.
Hardesty
A/4LX) , J. ,J Stiglich Silver
'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a postconviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.
pi- 37010
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Rahim Muhammad Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Muhammad (Rahim) Vs. State (Muhammad (Rahim) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.