Muhammad El v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners

86 F. App'x 600
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 2004
DocketNo. 03-2157
StatusPublished

This text of 86 F. App'x 600 (Muhammad El v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muhammad El v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners, 86 F. App'x 600 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A1 Maajid Muhammad El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and RICO complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find the appeal fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Muhammad El v. Maryland State Bd. of Law Exam’rs., CA-03-2366 (D.Md. Aug. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 F. App'x 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muhammad-el-v-maryland-state-board-of-law-examiners-ca4-2004.