Muhammad El v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners

Fourth Circuit

Muhammad El v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners

86 F. App'x 600

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2004·No. No. 03-2157·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A1 Maajid Muhammad El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and RICO complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find the appeal fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Muhammad El v. Maryland State Bd. of Law Exam’rs., CA-03-2366 (D.Md. Aug. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A1 Maajid Muhammad El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and RICO complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find the appeal fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Muhammad El v. Maryland State Bd. of Law Exam’rs., CA-03-2366 (D.Md. Aug. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Muhammad El v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners, 86 F. App'x 600 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

86 F. App'x 600 (Muhammad El v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related