Muhammad Bashir v. Zarghoona Zahid

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 12, 2011
Docket13-11-00048-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Muhammad Bashir v. Zarghoona Zahid (Muhammad Bashir v. Zarghoona Zahid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muhammad Bashir v. Zarghoona Zahid, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

                                       NUMBER 13-11-00048-CV

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MUHAMMAD BASHIR,                                                                 Appellant,

                                                             v.

ZARGHOONA ZAHID,                                                                    Appellee.

                           On appeal from the 317th District Court

                                     of Jefferson County, Texas.

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Muhammad Bashir, perfected an appeal from a final decree of divorce.  On February 23, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on January 19, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Maritza Downs, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record.  The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).       

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

12th day of May, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Muhammad Bashir v. Zarghoona Zahid, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muhammad-bashir-v-zarghoona-zahid-texapp-2011.