Muhamd v. ICE Field Office Director

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: January 15, 2021
• Docket: 2:20-cv-01862
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 MENTHER MUHAMD , 9 Petitioner, CASE NO. 2:20-cv-01862-RSM-BAT 10 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 11 ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR , 12 Respondent.

13 Petitioner moves the Court to appoint counsel in this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas action. 14 Dkt. 6. Petitioner request counsel be appointed because he is indigent, has been in immigration 15 custody for three years, and claims his continued detention violates his constitutional rights. 16 There is no right to have counsel appointed in § 2241 cases unless an evidentiary hearing is 17 required. See Terravona v. Kincheloe, 852 F.2d 424, 429 (9th Cir. 1988); Brown v. Vasquez, 952 18 F.2d 1164, 1168 (9th Cir. 1992). At this point it is premature to find an evidentiary hearing is 19 needed. The present petition is the second request for habeas relief filed by petitioner. His first 20 habeas petition was filed on March 4, 2020 and docketed under case number 2:20-cv-00605- 21 RAJ. The assigned district judge dismissed this petition on October 28, 2020. Given the case 22 history of the prior petition and the present matter, the court finds petitioner has the ability 23 articulate his claims and that the interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel. The 1 Court accordingly DENIES petitioner’s motion to appoint counsel. Dkt. 6. The Clerk shall send 2 copies of this Order to petitioner and the assigned District Judge. 3 DATED this 15th day of January, 2021. 4 A

5 BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA Chief United States Magistrate Judge 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23