Muhaimen Abdeljaber, A/K/A Emad Abdel-Jeper v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21800
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 9, 1995
Docket19-2383
StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1065 (Muhaimen Abdeljaber, A/K/A Emad Abdel-Jeper v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muhaimen Abdeljaber, A/K/A Emad Abdel-Jeper v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21800 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Muhaimen ABDELJABER, a/k/a Emad Abdel-Jeper, Petitioner,
v.
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 94-2540.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 1995.
Decided: June 9, 1995.

Muhaimen Abdeljaber, Petitioner Pro Se. Richard Michael Evans, Anthony Wray Norwood, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (Board) decision and order affirming the immigration judge's denial of his application for waiver of deportation. See 8 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1182(c) (West Supp.1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Abdeljaber v. INS, No. Adq-deq-gsi (B.I.A. Sept. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muhaimen-abdeljaber-aka-emad-abdel-jeper-v-us-immi-ca4-1995.