Mugrabi v. Bank of America, N.A.

S.D. New York

Mugrabi v. Bank of America, N.A.

DecidedNovember 2, 2023

Docket1:23-cv-09310

StatusUnknown

This text of Mugrabi v. Bank of America, N.A. (Mugrabi v. Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mugrabi v. Bank of America, N.A., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LIBBIE MUGRABI, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-9310 (AS) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; EQUIFAX

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC.; ORDER EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; and TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendants.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: On October 23, 2023, this action was removed from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, by Defendant Bank of America, N.A. See ECF No. 1. A civil action may not be removed unless “all defendants who have been properly joined and served . . . join in or consent to the removal of the action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1146(b)(2)(A); accord Pietrangelo v. Alvas Corp., 686 F.3d 62, 66 (2d Cir. 2012). Defendants who do not join in the removal “must independently express their consent to removal.” Id. A defendant must file a notice of removal within thirty days of receiving the initial pleading or summons, “if such initial pleading has then been filed in court and is not required to be served on the defendant, whichever period is shorter.” 28 U.S.C. § 1146(b)(1). Within that time, all defendants who have been “properly joined and served” must consent to the removal to federal court. Id.; see Taylor v. Medtronic, Inc., 15 F.4th 148, 153 (2d Cir. 2021) (“At bottom, nothing in the statute provides a court with any discretion to allow a party to cure a failure to meet the statute's requirements once the thirty-day period for removal lapses.”). There is no indication in the record presently that Defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC join in or consent to removal. While removal generally requires the unanimous consent of all defendants, there is an exception when “the non-joining defendants have not been served with service of process at the time the removal petition is filed... .” Varela v. Flintlock Const., Inc., 148 F. Supp. 2d 297, 300 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). Accordingly, no later than November 15, 2023, Plaintiff is ordered to file an affidavit testifying whether she has properly served that Defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC, attaching proof of the same. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2023 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LIBBIE MUGRABI, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-9310 (AS) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; EQUIFAX

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC.; ORDER EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; and TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendants.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: On October 23, 2023, this action was removed from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, by Defendant Bank of America, N.A. See ECF No. 1. A civil action may not be removed unless “all defendants who have been properly joined and served . . . join in or consent to the removal of the action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1146(b)(2)(A); accord Pietrangelo v. Alvas Corp., 686 F.3d 62, 66 (2d Cir. 2012). Defendants who do not join in the removal “must independently express their consent to removal.” Id. A defendant must file a notice of removal within thirty days of receiving the initial pleading or summons, “if such initial pleading has then been filed in court and is not required to be served on the defendant, whichever period is shorter.” 28 U.S.C. § 1146(b)(1). Within that time, all defendants who have been “properly joined and served” must consent to the removal to federal court. Id.; see Taylor v. Medtronic, Inc., 15 F.4th 148, 153 (2d Cir. 2021) (“At bottom, nothing in the statute provides a court with any discretion to allow a party to cure a failure to meet the statute's requirements once the thirty-day period for removal lapses.”). There is no indication in the record presently that Defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC join in or consent to removal. While removal generally requires the unanimous consent of all defendants, there is an exception when “the non-joining defendants have not been served with service of process at the time the removal petition is filed... .” Varela v. Flintlock Const., Inc., 148 F. Supp. 2d 297, 300 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). Accordingly, no later than November 15, 2023, Plaintiff is ordered to file an affidavit testifying whether she has properly served that Defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC, attaching proof of the same. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2023 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mugrabi v. Bank of America, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mugrabi-v-bank-of-america-na-nysd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack