Mugica v. Roccia
This text of Mugica v. Roccia (Mugica v. Roccia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MARTIN MUGICA and ULTINER § LLC, § No. 66, 2021 Defendants Below, § Appellants, § Court Below—Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. 2020-0641-MTZ LORENZO ROCCIA and § TRANSATLANTIC GROUP § PARTNERS LLC, § § Plaintiffs Below, § Appellee. § § and § § SKYLINE RENEWABLES, LLC, § § Nominal Defendant Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: October 13, 2021 Decided: October 15, 2021
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices, constituting the Court en banc.
ORDER This 15th day of October, 2021, after careful consideration of the argument of
counsel, the parties’ briefs, and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the
judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of its orders
dated December 29, 2020 and February 1, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mugica v. Roccia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mugica-v-roccia-del-2021.