Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co.
39 So. 80, 50 Fla. 620, 1905 Fla. LEXIS 270
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 Fla. 255 →
Opinion
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Cause dismissed on motion of counsel for the defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co., 39 So. 80, 50 Fla. 620, 1905 Fla. LEXIS 270 (Fla. 1905).
39 So. 80 (Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.