Mueller v. Tepler
This text of 39 A.3d 1120 (Mueller v. Tepler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Margaret A. MUELLER
v.
Isidore TEPLER et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Joshua D. Koskoff and Sean K. McElligott, Bridgeport, in support of the petition.
Eric J. Stockman and Simon I. Allentuch. New Haven, in opposition.
The petition by the plaintiff Charlotte Stacey for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 742, 33 A.3d 814 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's grant of the defendants' motion to strike based on grounds distinct from those that the trial court considered when granting the motion?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff Charlotte Stacey was not entitled to loss of consortium damages where she was not married to her domestic partner at the time of the partner's injury because neither civil unions nor same sex marriages were recognized at that time?"
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 A.3d 1120, 304 Conn. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mueller-v-tepler-conn-2012.