Mueller v. Mayo

Indiana Supreme Court

Mueller v. Mayo

38 Ind. 227

DecidedNovember 15, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Ind. 227 (Mueller v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mueller v. Mayo, 38 Ind. 227 (Ind. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Downey, J.

The appellant applied to the board of commissioners for a license to retail Intoxicating liquors. The appellees remonstrated. The board granted the license. The appellees appealed to the common pleas. The case was tried in the common pleas, upon an agreed statement of facts, and there was a finding and judgment against the applicant He appealed to this court

No appeal Is authorized, in such a case, to this court 3 Ind. Stat. 330, sec. 2; Brown v. Porter, 37 Ind. 206.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downey, J.

The appellant applied to the board of commissioners for a license to retail Intoxicating liquors. The appellees remonstrated. The board granted the license. The appellees appealed to the common pleas. The case was tried in the common pleas, upon an agreed statement of facts, and there was a finding and judgment against the applicant He appealed to this court

No appeal Is authorized, in such a case, to this court 3 Ind. Stat. 330, sec. 2; Brown v. Porter, 37 Ind. 206.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Ind. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mueller-v-mayo-ind-1871.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack