Mueller v. Henderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mueller v. Henderson

173 S.W.3d 647, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1514, 2005 WL 2649174

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 2005·No. ED 84098·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Justin Mueller and Danielle Mueller appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding both Plaintiff Justin Mueller and Defendant Alicia Henderson equally at fault in an automobile accident, assessing no damages to Plaintiff Justin Mueller for personal injury, and assessing no damages to Plaintiff Danielle Mueller for loss of consortium. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Justin Mueller and Danielle Mueller appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding both Plaintiff Justin Mueller and Defendant Alicia Henderson equally at fault in an automobile accident, assessing no damages to Plaintiff Justin Mueller for personal injury, and assessing no damages to Plaintiff Danielle Mueller for loss of consortium. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Mueller v. Henderson, 173 S.W.3d 647, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1514, 2005 WL 2649174 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

173 S.W.3d 647 (Mueller v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related