Mueller v. Adler
260 U.S. 694, 43 S. Ct. 12, 67 L. Ed. 468, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2388
Opinion
Dismissed for want .of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co., 228 U. S. 137, 144; Apapas v. United States, 233 U. S. 587, 589; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 372; Public Service Co. v. Corboy, 250 U. S. 153, [695]*695162; De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U. S. 166, 173.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mueller v. Adler, 260 U.S. 694, 43 S. Ct. 12, 67 L. Ed. 468, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2388 (1922).
260 U.S. 694 (Mueller v. Adler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co.
228 U.S. 137 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Apapas v. United States
233 U.S. 587 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Public Service Co. of Northern Ill. v. Corboy
250 U.S. 153 (Supreme Court, 1919)
De Rees v. Costaguta
254 U.S. 166 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
234 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 1914)