Mueller-Rice, Meagan v. MEDAT AG, Inc. d/b/a Poblanos Mexican Cuisine

2019 TN WC 90
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMay 31, 2019
Docket2017-01-0750
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 90 (Mueller-Rice, Meagan v. MEDAT AG, Inc. d/b/a Poblanos Mexican Cuisine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mueller-Rice, Meagan v. MEDAT AG, Inc. d/b/a Poblanos Mexican Cuisine, 2019 TN WC 90 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED

May 31, 2019 02:32 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA Meagan Mueller-Rice, ) Docket No.: 2017-01-0750 Employee, ) Vv. ) State File No.: 82287-2017 MEDATAG, Inc. d/b/a Poblanos ) Mexican Cuisine, ) Judge Audrey Headrick Uninsured Employer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER (DECISION ON THE RECORD)

This case came before the Court on Meagan Mueller-Rice’s Request for an Expedited Hearing on the record.' The issue is whether Ms. Mueller-Rice is likely to establish at trial that she is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits for the knee injuries sustained when she tripped over the leash of a customer’s dog. MEDATAG, Inc. d/b/a Poblanos Mexican Cuisine (Poblanos) did not respond to Ms. Mueller-Rice’s request for benefits. For the reasons below, the Court awards medical benefits but denies her claim for temporary disability benefits.

History of Claim

While working as a server at Poblanos on September 30, 2017, Ms. Mueller-Rice, a Tennessee resident, injured her knees when she tripped and fell over the leash of a customer’s dog.” Ms. Mueller-Rice notified manager Sabrina Holbrook of her injuries and left work to seek emergency treatment. The provider took Ms. Mueller off work for four days and referred her to see Dr. Thomas Brown, II, an orthopedist.

* The Court issued a docketing notice allowing the parties until May 29 to file objections or submit position statements. Poblanos did not request an evidentiary hearing, and the Court determined it needed no additional evidence to decide the issues.

* Poblanos allowed dogs on the premises. Text messages between Ms. Mueller-Rice and Ms. Holbrook show that she attempted to prompt Ms. Holbrook to file a claim and provide her with the carrier’s information. Although Ms. Holbrook advised her of information needed by insurance to “start [her] file,” she ultimately referred her to Irma Hyde, a Poblanos’ shareholder. Ms. Hyde informed Ms. Mueller-Rice by text that she did not “work enough hours to qualify for [workers’ compensation] insurance so [her] agent [was] looking into a different option.”

Ms. Mueller-Rice returned to the emergency room on October 9 and was taken off work until she followed up with an orthopedist. Ms. Mueller-Rice then filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on October 23, 2017. The Bureau’s compliance section investigated and prepared an Expedited Request for Investigation Report, noting that Poblanos admitted it was uninsured at the time of Ms. Mueller-Rice’s September 30, 2017 injury, and that it did not dispute the work injury.

Ms. Mueller-Rice saw Dr. Brown on November 29 for ongoing left-knee pain. He ordered an MRI, which showed a contusion and some edema, and he ordered physical therapy. Ms. Mueller-Rice last saw Dr. Brown on February 14, 2018, when he released her to return as needed.

With the exception of payment for a physical therapy visit and a portion of the MRI bill, Poblanos did not provide Ms. Mueller-Rice with any medical or temporary disability benefits. Ms. Mueller-Rice requested payment of her medical bills as well as temporary disability benefits.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Standard Applied

To prevail at an expedited hearing, Ms. Mueller-Rice must present sufficient evidence to prove she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018). The Court holds she would likely prevail in her claim for medical benefits but not temporary disability benefits.

Medical Benefits

Under the Workers’ Compensation Law, an employer must “furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment . . . made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a). To receive benefits, Ms. Mueller-Rice must show, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that the September 30, 2017 incident “contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the. . . disablement or need for medical treatment, considering all causes.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14). Here, the evidence submitted is sufficient to show that the fall over a dog’s leash caused Ms. Mueller-Rice’s September 30 work injury and need for medical treatment. The Court notes that the Dispute Certification Notice does not list compensability as a disputed issue, and it is unclear whether Poblanos participated in mediation. Based on the evidence submitted, Poblanos must pay for Ms. Mueller-Rice’s past and ongoing medical treatment for the September 30 work injury.

Temporary Disability Benefits

Ms. Mueller-Rice also requested temporary disability benefits. There are two kinds: temporary total and temporary partial. To receive temporary total disability (TTD) benefits, Ms. Mueller-Rice must prove (1) she became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection exists between the injury and her inability to work; and (3) she established the duration of her disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). Concerning temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits, Ms. Mueller-Rice is eligible for benefits if she earned less than her average weekly wage due to work restrictions. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(2)(A).

Here, Ms. Mueller-Rice might be entitled to past temporary disability benefits. However, the parties submitted no proof of her wages. Due to this lack of evidence, the Court must deny her request for temporary disability benefits at this time.

Penalty Unit Referral

The Penalty Program is specifically authorized to assess penalties under the Workers’ Compensation Law as well as the General Rules of the Workers’ Compensation Program. The Court finds that Poblanos is subject to possible penalty assessments under Tennessee Code Annotated section 501-6-118 for the following:

Failure to have workers’ compensation coverage; Bad-faith denial of Ms. Mueller-Rice’s claim; Failure to file a First Report of Work Injury, a Notice of Controversy, or a Notice of Denial of Claim; Failure to timely provide medical treatment; and, e Failure to timely provide a panel of physicians.

Therefore, the Court refers this matter to the Compliance Program for consideration of these and any other applicable penalties. Payment of Benefits

Poblanos must provide medical and temporary disability benefits. However, since it did not have workers’ compensation insurance at the time of the injury, the Uninsured Employers Fund (UEF) has discretion to pay limited temporary disability benefits and medical expenses if certain criteria are met. (See attached Benefits Request Form.) Ms. Mueller-Rice must establish, through her testimony, medical records, and the Bureau’s Compliance report, that she has proved or is likely to prove that she: 1) worked for an uninsured employer; 2) suffered an injury arising primarily in the course and scope of employment on or after July 1, 2015; 3) was a Tennessee resident on the date of injury; 4) provided notice to the Bureau of the injury and of the employer’s lack of coverage within sixty days of the injury; and, 5) secured a judgment for workers’ compensation benefits against Poblanos for the injury. Tenn. Code Ann. §

Related

§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)
§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)
§ 50-6-207
Tennessee § 50-6-207(2)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)
§ 50-6-801
Tennessee § 50-6-801(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mueller-rice-meagan-v-medat-ag-inc-dba-poblanos-mexican-cuisine-tennworkcompcl-2019.