Muela v. State
This text of 227 S.W.2d 808 (Muela v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a case of robbery by assault; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.
The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.
[809]*809Carreon, the injured party, testified that about two o’clock in the morning, as he was walking down a street in the city of El Paso, he was jointly attacked and assaulted by two men and there was taken from off his person a billfold containing some Mexican currency.
We note that Carreon testified: “Yes, sir, this defendant is one of the men that jumped on me and took my billfold.”
We are unable to conclude, especially in view of the statement just quoted, that the facts are insufficient to support the verdict.
The judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 S.W.2d 808, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muela-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.