Muecke Company, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corpor

512 F. App'x 395
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 11, 2013·No. 12-40475·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

CVS Pharmacy, Incorporated, Care-mark Rx, L.L.C., and CVS Caremark Corporation (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration of claims brought against them by the Appellees, a group of pharmacies. The parties do not dispute that the arbitration agreements in question were not signed by Appellants, only (at most) by Appellees. Thus, Appellants rest their request for arbitration upon the doctrine of equitable estoppel, and our review of the district court’s decision is for abuse of discretion. Noble Drilling Servs., Inc. v. Certex USA, Inc., 620 F.3d 469, 472-73 & n. 4 (5th Cir.2010).

We have carefully reviewed the pertinent portions of the record in light of the parties’ briefs and oral arguments. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to compel arbitration as to the claims against Appellants.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cut. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muecke Company, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corpor, 512 F. App'x 395 (5th Cir. 2013).

512 F. App'x 395 (Muecke Company, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corpor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West Virginia CVS Pharmacy, LLC v. McDowell Pharmacy, Inc.
796 S.E.2d 574 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2017)
Muecke Company, Incorporated v. CVS Caremar
615 F. App'x 837 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)